Guild Debuff/en: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Updating to match new version of source page) |
(Updating to match new version of source page) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<languages></languages> | <languages></languages> | ||
= | =Guild Debuff= | ||
We want to create conditions where the guild owning the castle does not benefit from having a huge guild and not to limit all other guilds in the same time. And if one guild has managed to own the castle for a few weeks in a row, that wouldn't mean that they are a little stronger or more lucky, but that they are a lot more powerful than everyone else and deserve to hold the crown. | We want to create conditions where the guild owning the castle does not benefit from having a huge guild and not to limit all other guilds in the same time. And if one guild has managed to own the castle for a few weeks in a row, that wouldn't mean that they are a little stronger or more lucky, but that they are a lot more powerful than everyone else and deserve to hold the crown. | ||
'''The new system:''' | '''The new system:''' | ||
* In case the guild that owns the castle successfully defends the castle, the attackers on the next siege get a buff 8% Damage, +4% Absorb, +200 True Damage, +3000 HP. If the last statue was destroyed during the siege, the power of the buff will double. This buff increases with each siege when the defenders are successful. The buff ir reset to 0, if the castle changes owners. | |||
* In case the guild that owns the castle successfully defends the castle, the attackers on the next siege get a buff | |||
* If the amount of members of the guild that owns the castle is higher then set certain (20/25), then their buff is decreased judged by how much people they exceed the limit. | * If the amount of members of the guild that owns the castle is higher then set certain (20/25), then their buff is decreased judged by how much people they exceed the limit. | ||
'''For regular guild masters: | '''For regular guild masters: | ||
* 31 and more: -30% buff | * 31 and more: -30% buff | ||
* 26 and more: -20% buff | * 26 and more: -20% buff | ||
Line 23: | Line 14: | ||
'''For Dark Lords:''' | '''For Dark Lords:''' | ||
* 36 and more: -20% buff | * 36 and more: -20% buff | ||
* 31 and more: -15% buff | * 31 and more: -15% buff |
Latest revision as of 13:46, 17 July 2024
Guild Debuff
We want to create conditions where the guild owning the castle does not benefit from having a huge guild and not to limit all other guilds in the same time. And if one guild has managed to own the castle for a few weeks in a row, that wouldn't mean that they are a little stronger or more lucky, but that they are a lot more powerful than everyone else and deserve to hold the crown.
The new system:
- In case the guild that owns the castle successfully defends the castle, the attackers on the next siege get a buff 8% Damage, +4% Absorb, +200 True Damage, +3000 HP. If the last statue was destroyed during the siege, the power of the buff will double. This buff increases with each siege when the defenders are successful. The buff ir reset to 0, if the castle changes owners.
- If the amount of members of the guild that owns the castle is higher then set certain (20/25), then their buff is decreased judged by how much people they exceed the limit.
For regular guild masters:
- 31 and more: -30% buff
- 26 and more: -20% buff
- 21 and more: -10% buff
For Dark Lords:
- 36 and more: -20% buff
- 31 and more: -15% buff
- 26 and more: -10% buff